Service


Seminar/Human Resource Development
Familiarize Course of Non-Financial Blockchain Technology in Enterprise Space

Commercialization Support & Full Consulting/Project Promotion Support
Development & Deployment of Non-Financial Blockchain
from Manufacturing, Infrastructure, Supply Chain and Logistics to Brand Marketing

Development from PoC/MVP to Production
Total Services by Well Experienced Staff from Initial Consulting to Development of Pilot Project and Production, Something Like One Stop Shopping
Case Study
Case 1. Shiseido Company, Limited

ブランドアシスタント 鈴木翔様(写真右)
What was your impression of our company in the early stages of the project?
In the process of communicating with the company to determine the feasibility of the project, I felt that the company had not only blockchain technology, but also a high level of “service quality and proposal capability,” “sense of speed,” and “reasonable price. For example, in the early stages of the PJT, I was strongly impressed by the fact that the company made proposals that included the use of RFID from a brand perspective, not just from the perspective of a system development company.
Why did you finally choose our company?
There were three reasons why we chose your company as our system development company.
First, they had an extremely high level of expertise in the use of blockchain in a marketing context. Instead of blockchain being used for virtual currency, he was able to propose blockchain from a more long-term and holistic perspective with a marketing leaning.
Secondly, they had the ability to make solid proposals that considered the entire PJT, including proposals for themes around blockchain, such as the use of RFID. Perhaps it was the fact that Mr. Fujita had a lot of experience in marketing support and Mr. Nakamura had experience in application development and hardware work, but I felt that they would be able to work together with a sense of ownership and wisdom to promote the PJT.
Thirdly, by placing an order directly with a system development company, the investment in blockchain development is reduced to a certain extent, and the answers to our questions are quicker.
The approval or rejection of an internal proposal is based on two factors: the amount of money the proposal will cost, and the return on investment. If the proposal cost is too high, especially for a new PJT proposal, the proposal is often rejected at the time of the proposal cost.
Not only in our PJTs, but also in PJTs where the primary contractor intervenes to have the subcontracted development company make proposals and confirm them, it is often the case that questions cannot be answered immediately and there is a gap in the understanding of the development content. In this case, however, we were able to communicate directly with the system development company, so we were able to proceed with the PJT without intermediate communication with the primary vendor or intermediate costs.
What is your impression of our company?
As a PMO, Mr. Fujita’s knowledge and connections in the legal field helped us to sort out the legal issues and gave us advice from a third party’s point of view. As the PMO, Mr. Fujita’s legal knowledge and connections helped us to sort out the legal issues and gave us advice from a third party’s point of view, which was very helpful. In the PMO of system development, Mr. Fujita and Mr. Nakamura were very helpful in coordinating with other vendors so that we could proceed with the PJT more smoothly. In the development of the system, we were able to greatly reduce the man-hours by using TradeLog’s blockchain API, YUBIKIRI, which accelerated the development speed and reduced the cost.
This PJT is gradually gaining recognition within the company, and people say to me, “How did you coordinate so well? I believe that this is due to the comprehensive support of Trade Log, who also provided support as PMO. In the next phase of the project, I hope that you will continue to support us in our efforts to spread and establish the system among our customers.
Case 2. Bridgestone Software Co., Ltd.

当社の第一印象は?
代表取締役の藤田氏を中心に、社内外の様々な技術者・研究者の方とのコネクションで成立している組織だと感じました。弊社では手探りの状態からブロックチェーンの研究に着手していたので、幅広い分野の人脈とチームを組んでいただける可能性を感じました。
他社ではなく当社を選んだ理由は?
ブロックチェーンに関して、PoCの経験がある・研究会を主催したことがあるといったベンダー候補はトレードログ以外にも存在しましたが、専門性に注目しました。トレードログは「ブロックチェーン専門に特化したコンサルティングサービス」を提供している点が魅力的でした。
当社のサービスの良かった点は?
まず。予算や人員に合わせてコンパクトにプロジェクトを進められる点です。スケジュールも弊社の事情に応じて設定いただき、とても感謝しております。次に自分たちの学習・開発の進度に合わせて対応いただける点です。特に初期、ブロックチェーン技術の詳細について学習に行き詰まった際に、噛み砕いた説明をいただけたことが大きな助けとなりました。また、急遽短納期の案件で「ブロックチェーンの機能を組み込みたい」といった要望があった際、迅速に体制を整えて弊社の開発チームにご助言、ご助力をいただきました。ブロックチェーンに特化した開発人員を急遽調達できる専門性と、予定外の要望にも柔軟に応えていただけるホスピタリティが強く印象に残りました。
ブロックチェーンは今後規模の大きな開発が必要になってくる可能性が十分にある技術です。トレードログは株式会社リッカ様による協力関係のもと、さらにブロックチェーン事業部門を拡充し、コンサルティングと開発の体制を大きく強化していくと伺っております。ブロックチェーンにおける新しい取り組みを弊社が試みていくにあたり、引き続きご協力願いたく思っております。